Its placement has no bearing on her driving, but the atrial fibrillation potentially does. Was it unethical to not discuss revoking my wife’s license with her before doing it?Ī: The Watchman device is placed to reduce the risk of stroke in people with atrial fibrillation, a rhythm disturbance of the heart. The doctor involved said, in her notes: “She is doing well, no concerns.” She has not had any device implanted to maintain rhythm. I have seen the after-visit notes of all the doctors my wife has seen in the last three months. She saw both of these physicians after she saw the physician who notified the DMV that she should not drive.

She also saw her regular cardiologist, and he said she is doing well. She saw the cardiologist who performed the Watchman surgery, and he said she is doing well. My wife has had no symptoms since the surgery. She recently had a Watchman device placed, but no one ever said she shouldn’t drive. My wife had a stroke about two years ago, but there are no obvious signs that she shouldn’t be driving outside of that.

There was no discussion with my wife about driving. The new placard was received, followed by a letter from the DMV instructing my wife to return her license within 10 days because a medical professional had deemed it unsafe for her to drive.

Q: My wife’s handicap parking placard expired, and she asked her primary care physician to fill out a renewal application. Uber driver Nola Vehikite, who doesn't have her own car, holds the key to a 2015 Ford Explorer she rented for the day via an app called HyreCar on Friday Jin San Francisco, Calif.

Driver booster key 2015